Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Shake it up Baby, now!
Let me just reiterate reason number 16 why I love California: Earthquakes!!!! Tonight we had an earthquake and here's what I know: a pretty sweet magnitude 5.6 earthquake never hurt anyone! I told Jared that this was the strongest earthquake I've ever felt. That may not be true, but I wasn't lying (I was riding in a bus when the big one in '89 hit, so I didn't feel it's full effects). It got a little scary when it kept going and going and going, but mostly it was just exciting! I love you, California!!!!!
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Here Comes the Sun. . .
I would just like to reiterate reason #1 why I love California. THE WEATHER IS AMAZING!!!!!! It is late October and we're enjoying daytime highs of the upper 70's to low 80's. I don't even need a jacket in San Francisco!
Friday, October 19, 2007
Aim High
Sometimes working with high school kids can be aggravating, but sometimes it can be hilarious. A couple weeks ago, I was covering a high school football game. It was fleet week, so the Blue Angels were practicing during the game and flew by frequently. The doctor and I were chatting about the Blue Angels with one of the football players on the sideline. This kid is one of the better players on the team and has high hopes for a career in the NFL. The doctor told him that he wanted to figure out a way to get a ride in one of the jets. The kid thought that would be cool and then he responded with one of the best quotes I've heard in a long time. "If football doesn't work out, I'm going to space!"
Monday, October 15, 2007
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Newsweek
As you may or may not know, Newsweek recently did an article on Mitt Romney and how his Mormon faith has shaped his life. It was an interesting article, but some aspects of it rubbed me the wrong way. And it bothered me enough that I wrote a letter to Newsweek. Now, I understand that Newsweek probably doesn't care what I think or what I had to say. But, I feel better having expressed my opinion and aggravation with them. For your reading pleasure, here's the link to the Newsweek article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21049285/site/newsweek/from/ET/
And here is the text of the email I sent them in response:
Dear Mr. Meacham:
I was recently interested to see the cover story of the October 8th issue of Newsweek on Mitt Romney and his religion. As a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or Mormon church, I was interested to see how your publication would portray my religion and its role in the life of Mitt Romney. As is too often the case when reading a media piece on the Mormon church, I was disappointed in parts of the article. Unfortunately, this time around I also found aspects of the article offensive in its language.
In the past, I have explained away inaccurate media portrayals of the Mormon church as the product of misunderstanding or inadequate knowledge of the subject. However, after innumerable such portrayals, my patience has grown thin and I have become weary of the media trying to explain to the American public a subject of which they do not have an adequate comprehension. Please do not misunderstand. I'm not trying to belittle or criticize the investigative efforts of your staff in understanding the Mormon faith. I admire their willingness to travel to Salt Lake City and spend time in learning about our faith. However, for someone who is not a member of our church to try to explain our church and how it affects our lives to someone else who is not a member of our church is like one American trying to explain to another American what it's like to grow up in Japan. In order to truly understand religion and faith, you must experience them, not just learn about them. The portrayal of our religion, then, by someone not of our faith is inherently inaccurate because it is born of knowledge (supposed or real) and not experience. And because the portrayal is not based on experience, it may grow from false information, biases, and ignorance.
To quote your publication's article, "More than 100 years after it outlawed polygamy, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints remains an object of mystery and ridicule for many in the country" (pg. 30). Naturally our church is an object of mystery and ridicule when portrayed in the light with which your publication and almost all media portrays it. Language such as "sacred temple rituals" and "anointings and other secret rites" (pg. 31) lend an air of mystery and darkness which will naturally draw people to look at our so-called "oddball theology" (pg 4, The Editor's Desk) in a negative light. As I mentioned, I found parts of the article offensive in its language. Perhaps this will be difficult to understand without having the experience of actually being mormon. The worship in which we participate in the temples is very sacred and important to us. When referring to our sacred temple worship as "secret rites" or "rituals", it casts a negative and dark connotation to something we hold very dear. It is disturbing to note that the article treats with such levity and disrespect something that has such a deep and profound meaning to me. In a country founded on religious freedom, I would expect more than that.
It's no wonder Mitt Romney doesn't like to expand on his religious beliefs and practices when this is how they are portrayed to the American public. And when the media only focuses on complex aspects of our religion which differ from other religions, such as polygamy or baptisms for the dead, of course the American public will have a hard time understanding our faith. Much of the doctrine the media likes to focus on is difficult to understand without a firm understanding of our more basic beliefs. Presenting these more complex and advanced doctrines to an American public which doesn't have a firm knowledge of our basic doctrines is akin to trying to teach a medical student how to perform surgery when he has yet to learn basic human anatomy.
When you take a closer look at our church, however, you will see that it's not so different after all. We believe in Jesus Christ as our Savior and Redeemer. We believe in and are led by prophets and apostles as were the members of Christ's church as he established it when he lived on the earth. We believe in the Bible as the word of God. All of these more fundamental doctrines are not difficult to understand and are actually doctrines that we share in common with other faiths. I believe that Mitt Romney's reluctance to talk about his religion is not because he doesn't want people to understand it. On the contrary, most members of the Mormon church are eager for others to understand what we believe. However, when the media pushes to discuss complex doctrines without an understanding of basic doctrines first, it fosters more confusion than understanding. Forgive Mitt Romney for wanting to focus on politics to win a political election and to refrain from feeding the media fire of misrepresentation of the Mormon church.
I did find the article's background on Mitt Romney interesting and I do appreciate the attention the article brings to our often misunderstood faith. However, I keep hoping to see the media treating the Mormon church with the respect for which this country stands and for which our founding fathers worked so hard. I hope that in the future, you will acknowledge that every religion, regardless of what they believe, deserves to be portrayed with respect and that you will bear in mind the sacred nature of one's religious beliefs.
Best regards,
Jenni Jespersen
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21049285/site/newsweek/from/ET/
And here is the text of the email I sent them in response:
Dear Mr. Meacham:
I was recently interested to see the cover story of the October 8th issue of Newsweek on Mitt Romney and his religion. As a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or Mormon church, I was interested to see how your publication would portray my religion and its role in the life of Mitt Romney. As is too often the case when reading a media piece on the Mormon church, I was disappointed in parts of the article. Unfortunately, this time around I also found aspects of the article offensive in its language.
In the past, I have explained away inaccurate media portrayals of the Mormon church as the product of misunderstanding or inadequate knowledge of the subject. However, after innumerable such portrayals, my patience has grown thin and I have become weary of the media trying to explain to the American public a subject of which they do not have an adequate comprehension. Please do not misunderstand. I'm not trying to belittle or criticize the investigative efforts of your staff in understanding the Mormon faith. I admire their willingness to travel to Salt Lake City and spend time in learning about our faith. However, for someone who is not a member of our church to try to explain our church and how it affects our lives to someone else who is not a member of our church is like one American trying to explain to another American what it's like to grow up in Japan. In order to truly understand religion and faith, you must experience them, not just learn about them. The portrayal of our religion, then, by someone not of our faith is inherently inaccurate because it is born of knowledge (supposed or real) and not experience. And because the portrayal is not based on experience, it may grow from false information, biases, and ignorance.
To quote your publication's article, "More than 100 years after it outlawed polygamy, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints remains an object of mystery and ridicule for many in the country" (pg. 30). Naturally our church is an object of mystery and ridicule when portrayed in the light with which your publication and almost all media portrays it. Language such as "sacred temple rituals" and "anointings and other secret rites" (pg. 31) lend an air of mystery and darkness which will naturally draw people to look at our so-called "oddball theology" (pg 4, The Editor's Desk) in a negative light. As I mentioned, I found parts of the article offensive in its language. Perhaps this will be difficult to understand without having the experience of actually being mormon. The worship in which we participate in the temples is very sacred and important to us. When referring to our sacred temple worship as "secret rites" or "rituals", it casts a negative and dark connotation to something we hold very dear. It is disturbing to note that the article treats with such levity and disrespect something that has such a deep and profound meaning to me. In a country founded on religious freedom, I would expect more than that.
It's no wonder Mitt Romney doesn't like to expand on his religious beliefs and practices when this is how they are portrayed to the American public. And when the media only focuses on complex aspects of our religion which differ from other religions, such as polygamy or baptisms for the dead, of course the American public will have a hard time understanding our faith. Much of the doctrine the media likes to focus on is difficult to understand without a firm understanding of our more basic beliefs. Presenting these more complex and advanced doctrines to an American public which doesn't have a firm knowledge of our basic doctrines is akin to trying to teach a medical student how to perform surgery when he has yet to learn basic human anatomy.
When you take a closer look at our church, however, you will see that it's not so different after all. We believe in Jesus Christ as our Savior and Redeemer. We believe in and are led by prophets and apostles as were the members of Christ's church as he established it when he lived on the earth. We believe in the Bible as the word of God. All of these more fundamental doctrines are not difficult to understand and are actually doctrines that we share in common with other faiths. I believe that Mitt Romney's reluctance to talk about his religion is not because he doesn't want people to understand it. On the contrary, most members of the Mormon church are eager for others to understand what we believe. However, when the media pushes to discuss complex doctrines without an understanding of basic doctrines first, it fosters more confusion than understanding. Forgive Mitt Romney for wanting to focus on politics to win a political election and to refrain from feeding the media fire of misrepresentation of the Mormon church.
I did find the article's background on Mitt Romney interesting and I do appreciate the attention the article brings to our often misunderstood faith. However, I keep hoping to see the media treating the Mormon church with the respect for which this country stands and for which our founding fathers worked so hard. I hope that in the future, you will acknowledge that every religion, regardless of what they believe, deserves to be portrayed with respect and that you will bear in mind the sacred nature of one's religious beliefs.
Best regards,
Jenni Jespersen
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
Wedding Hair
Having smart friends is great. Especially when they're smart about things you need help with. Like wedding planning. Yesterday I went shopping with my friend Jessica who is a hairdresser. Not only is she a hairdresser, but she is a damn good one! She is excellent at making people look beautiful. Naturally, she is my wedding hair consultant. So, when I needed to look for a little something to make my hair beautiful on my wedding day, I brought Jessica with me. And boy was that a smart move! I also took my friend Amy, who is my official wedding consultant with me. The three of us looked at several hair things, but it was Jessica (obviously) who found the most awesome thing that Amy and I would have totally passed by without a second thought. I wasn't convinced when Jessica picked it up, or even when she put it in my hair. But, when I looked in the mirror, it was so cute! So, now my wedding hair thing is taken care of and Jessica remains, as always, brilliant when it comes to hair (she's also brilliant about other things, but this post is about her hair abilities). And you will all agree when you see me at my wedding. Hooray for friends who are good at things that I'm not good at!
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Run Flats
This morning I had to go to work early. I left my house at 5:30 am in order to be in the city by around 6:30 am. It was still dark outside. Driving along 280, I passed a construction zone which, due to the earliness of the morning, still had the left 3 lanes closed. Shortly after passing the construction zone, Maggie started flashing me a warning light. Maggie is my MINI Cooper S who treats me very well. I started to get a little nervous and my heart started beating a little faster because I didn't know what the symbol was for on the warning light. I looked at it a little closer and decided it looked like a tire and was, therefore, the symbol for a flat tire. So, I thought, "oh crap! I probably ran over something in that stupid construction zone." Since the MINI Cooper S comes with Run Flat Tires as a standard feature, I figured I could at least get into the city and then figure out what to do if I really did have a flat. So, I pulled out my owner's manual to double check the meaning of the symbol (all while I'm driving of course - I couldn't be late). It was indeed the symbol for a flat tire (or a significant difference in the pressure of one tire compared to the others). I read through the section on the Flat Tire Monitor in my manual (still driving along - only safe at 6 in the morning) and noted that the Flat Tire Monitor should be reset after changing the tire pressure, rotating the tires, or anything of that nature. I recently had my tires rotated and figured it probably hadn't been reset, so I tried to do that while I was driving, but it didn't work (you have to start the initialization when you're stopped).
So, as I cruised along with my apparent flat tire, I started thinking about the implications of the situation. Keeping the hope of a mere difference in tire pressure in the back of my mind, I started thinking about what I would need to do if the tire was flat. I figured I could probably get home on the tire, but then I would have to get a new tire because Run Flats cannot be fixed. And Run Flat tires are expensive. Then I started comparing my current tire situation with the last flat tire I had. That was in my Isuzu Rodeo which did not have Run Flat tires. I was fortunate to have gotten that flat right in front of my house. I ran over a screw which punctured the tire and left it completely flat in about 15 minutes. To take care of that one, I spent an hour changing the tire so I could drive to a tire place and have it fixed. (As a side note, I took it to America's Tire Company which fixes flat tires for free. They were pretty awesome there and when it was time for new tires, you better believe that's where I went. I have since determined to take care of all of my tire needs at America's Tire Company!) It cost me nothing except for my time and effort to fix the tire. Had it happened farther from my house, though, I would've been stuck changing a flat who knows where in the dark. With this in mind as I cruised along with the flat tire warning lit up, all of a sudden Run Flats didn't seem like they were really too expensive. Then I thought about what I would be doing if my MINI had regular tires. I would be stuck on the side of 280 at 6 am in the dark trying to change a tire. And I would've been late for work. And I would've been dirty. Run Flat tires were becoming a better deal by the minute! When I finally got into the parking lot and parked my car, I took a closer look at the manual (there's only so much you can pick up on when you're also watching the road). I was supposed to have slowed the car down to 50 mph (oops! - I just kept cruising along at 70 to 80 mph) and then I was supposed to check the tire pressure as soon as possible. It was not possible at that moment because it was dark outside and I had to get to work. So, I figured I would just check it later and go from there. Then I looked in the manual to find out how far I could drive on the flat to see if I could get home (I had already driven about 20 miles on it). The manual said that with a light load (1-2 people) I could go an astonishing 155 miled on the tire with 0 psi of pressure!!!!!!!!!! That is amazing! I knew I could make it home on that, so I went to work and decided I would check the tire pressure later and then figure out what I needed to do. Of course, I was still hoping for one of the tires just to be a little low.
Upon returning to Maggie, I checked the tire pressure and found one of the tires to be a little lower than the others, but it really hadn't lost much pressure - that I took as a positive sign. So I took Maggie to a gas station and put a little more air in the tire. I then reset the Flat Tire Monitor and the warning light went off. This immediately boosted my hopes and made me feel better about life. I drove all the way home with no warning lights going off and no problem with the tire. Hooray!!!! It wasn't a flat after all!
While the whole situation was a little scary and made for an intense day, it made me realize how awesome Run Flat Tires are. They are amazing! To have a tire go flat and be able to still drive on it and get it fixed at your leisure and convenience is totally worth the couple hundred dollars for a new tire (granted, if I was constantly getting flat tires, I might be singing a different tune). To have a tire go flat and not be stuck on the side of the road changing it in the dark is totally worth paying a more for tires. Run Flat tires are powerful and they will change your life! And once again, Maggie takes good care of me.
Thanks, Run Flats, for making all of my wildest dreams come true!
So, as I cruised along with my apparent flat tire, I started thinking about the implications of the situation. Keeping the hope of a mere difference in tire pressure in the back of my mind, I started thinking about what I would need to do if the tire was flat. I figured I could probably get home on the tire, but then I would have to get a new tire because Run Flats cannot be fixed. And Run Flat tires are expensive. Then I started comparing my current tire situation with the last flat tire I had. That was in my Isuzu Rodeo which did not have Run Flat tires. I was fortunate to have gotten that flat right in front of my house. I ran over a screw which punctured the tire and left it completely flat in about 15 minutes. To take care of that one, I spent an hour changing the tire so I could drive to a tire place and have it fixed. (As a side note, I took it to America's Tire Company which fixes flat tires for free. They were pretty awesome there and when it was time for new tires, you better believe that's where I went. I have since determined to take care of all of my tire needs at America's Tire Company!) It cost me nothing except for my time and effort to fix the tire. Had it happened farther from my house, though, I would've been stuck changing a flat who knows where in the dark. With this in mind as I cruised along with the flat tire warning lit up, all of a sudden Run Flats didn't seem like they were really too expensive. Then I thought about what I would be doing if my MINI had regular tires. I would be stuck on the side of 280 at 6 am in the dark trying to change a tire. And I would've been late for work. And I would've been dirty. Run Flat tires were becoming a better deal by the minute! When I finally got into the parking lot and parked my car, I took a closer look at the manual (there's only so much you can pick up on when you're also watching the road). I was supposed to have slowed the car down to 50 mph (oops! - I just kept cruising along at 70 to 80 mph) and then I was supposed to check the tire pressure as soon as possible. It was not possible at that moment because it was dark outside and I had to get to work. So, I figured I would just check it later and go from there. Then I looked in the manual to find out how far I could drive on the flat to see if I could get home (I had already driven about 20 miles on it). The manual said that with a light load (1-2 people) I could go an astonishing 155 miled on the tire with 0 psi of pressure!!!!!!!!!! That is amazing! I knew I could make it home on that, so I went to work and decided I would check the tire pressure later and then figure out what I needed to do. Of course, I was still hoping for one of the tires just to be a little low.
Upon returning to Maggie, I checked the tire pressure and found one of the tires to be a little lower than the others, but it really hadn't lost much pressure - that I took as a positive sign. So I took Maggie to a gas station and put a little more air in the tire. I then reset the Flat Tire Monitor and the warning light went off. This immediately boosted my hopes and made me feel better about life. I drove all the way home with no warning lights going off and no problem with the tire. Hooray!!!! It wasn't a flat after all!
While the whole situation was a little scary and made for an intense day, it made me realize how awesome Run Flat Tires are. They are amazing! To have a tire go flat and be able to still drive on it and get it fixed at your leisure and convenience is totally worth the couple hundred dollars for a new tire (granted, if I was constantly getting flat tires, I might be singing a different tune). To have a tire go flat and not be stuck on the side of the road changing it in the dark is totally worth paying a more for tires. Run Flat tires are powerful and they will change your life! And once again, Maggie takes good care of me.
Thanks, Run Flats, for making all of my wildest dreams come true!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)